Gun Shop Panic: Chilling ICE Threats – Lawyer Nabbed Fast

Person holding a handgun in a gun shop
Photo: Nomad_Soul / Shutterstock

Federal agents arrested a Florida-licensed attorney after she allegedly vowed to kill Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel while trying to buy a gun and pepper spray.

Story Highlights

  • Homeland Security agents arrested Lisa C. White after a gun store reported explicit threats to kill federal agents.
  • Witnesses said she asked if bullets could pierce body armor and discussed aiming for unprotected areas.
  • The report says she tried to buy a firearm and pepper spray at a Mississippi gun shop on September 23.
  • Authorities identified a federal charge tied to threats against officials, carrying up to 10 years in prison.

Arrest Follows Reported Threats at Mississippi Gun Store

Homeland Security Investigations agents arrested Florida-licensed attorney Lisa C. White after staff at High Caliber Guns in Long Beach, Mississippi, reported she threatened to kill federal agents while attempting to buy a gun and pepper spray. The incident occurred on September 23, 2026, around late morning, according to reporting that cites a federal complaint filed by a named Homeland Security Investigations special agent. Immigration and Customs Enforcement stated the threats were explicit and targeted immigration officers charged with enforcing the law.

Reports say White told staff she was a protester and activist and said, “I need a gun,” before describing how she would attack agents. Employees alerted the store owner, who contacted the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. That referral moved to Homeland Security Investigations, which interviewed witnesses and made the arrest the next day, September 24. This chain shows a clear handoff from the store to federal authorities that ended with a custody action.

Statements Allegedly Focused on Bypassing Body Armor

Accounts based on the complaint say White asked if bullets could penetrate ballistic vests worn by agents. When told about the protection, she allegedly gestured to her torso and said she would shoot the head, shoulder, arm, or leg instead. That detail goes to intent and target choice, according to the government’s narrative. The allegation is not vague political talk; it is a claimed plan to defeat armor, which prosecutors often treat as evidence of a true threat.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement said agents moved forward on a federal theory that covers threats meant to influence, impede, or retaliate against federal officials. Local reporting cited a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine under that charge. That signals this is not a trespass or disorder case. It is a serious allegation tied to violence against officers who serve on the front lines of immigration enforcement.

Gun Purchase Attempt and Legal Stakes Under First Amendment Law

Reports agree White tried to buy a firearm and pepper spray during the encounter. The available information does not show a completed gun sale, but it does show active steps to obtain weapons while making the alleged threats. That pairing of words and conduct often matters in court. The Supreme Court has said true threats are not protected speech, and the government must show the speaker at least knew, or recklessly ignored, the threatening nature of the words.

Homeland Security Investigations and Immigration and Customs Enforcement are responsible for guarding federal officers and the public from acts of targeted violence. In this case, the store’s quick report and the referral to federal authorities likely helped prevent potential harm. This is how the system should work: citizens speak up, agencies coordinate, and officers act before words turn into violence. One outlet reported a later court filing and a not guilty plea; exact docket details were not provided in that account.

Why This Matters to Law, Order, and Border Security

Threats to kill immigration agents strike at the rule of law and the men and women who carry it out. These officers enforce immigration and border policy that protects communities, stops traffickers, and upholds national sovereignty. When someone allegedly seeks a gun while talking about how to shoot around body armor, that is a red line. Under President Trump, federal agencies have a clear mandate: defend officers, safeguard the border, and shut down violent attacks fast.

Free speech is vital, but it ends where a true threat begins. The claim here is not about harsh words at a rally. It is about a directed threat, tied to a gun purchase attempt, aimed at a known group of federal officials. If proven, that crosses the First Amendment line. If not, the court process will decide. For now, the record shows a reported threat, a swift investigation, and an arrest rooted in a specific federal statute and clear public safety concerns.

Sources:

pjmedia.com, wlox.com, whmi.com, thepostmillennial.com, knoe.com